Novel antiangiogenic therapies against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Angiogenesis is a cornerstone in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis. In the sorafenib era, other antiangiogenic targeted drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies and a new generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have been shown in phase II trials to be safe and effective in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Several currently active phase III trials are testing these drugs, both in first- and second-line settings. Strategies to overcome primary and acquired resistance to antiangiogenic therapy are urgently needed. Novel biomarkers may help in improving the efficacy of drugs targeting angiogenesis.

Novel antiangiogenic therapies against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Angiogenesis is a cornerstone in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis. In the sorafenib era, other antiangiogenic targeted drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies and a new generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have been shown in phase II trials to be safe and effective in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Several currently active phase III trials are testing these drugs, both in first- and second-line settings. Strategies to overcome primary and acquired resistance to antiangiogenic therapy are urgently needed. Novel biomarkers may help in improving the efficacy of drugs targeting angiogenesis (AU)

Targeting sodium/iodide symporter gene expression for estrogen-regulated imaging and therapy in breast cancer.

Expression of the sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) has been detected in breast cancer tissue, but frequently, not at the levels necessary to mediate (131)I accumulation. Transducing the hNIS gene into breast cancer cells with adenovirus could be a tractable strategy to render breast cancer susceptible to radioiodide therapy. We constructed the replication-incompetent virus, AdSERE, in which an estrogen-responsive promoter directs the expression of hNIS. In vitro, we demonstrate that AdSERE mediates hNIS expression and iodide uptake in ER+ breast cancer cells. In vivo, we show that AdSERE-infected ER+ tumors can be imaged due to tracer accumulation; in addition, AdSERE in combination with therapeutic doses of (131)I suppresses tumor growth.

Uveal vs. cutaneous melanoma. Origins and causes of the differences

Melanoma is a malignant tumour derived from melanocytes (dendritic cells originated from the neural crest and capable to produce melanin synthesis) that could be established on the skin or less frequently on the uvea. The cellular origin from both kind of melanoma seems to be the same but the melanocytes migrates to the epithelia for cutaneous melanoma, while for uveal melanoma, they migrate to mesodermic tissues. Despite the common origin, both melanomas show extreme differences in their metastatic potential, clinical response to treatments, immune response and genetic alterations. We will describe some of those differences in this review (AU)

No disponible

Non-invasive genetic imaging for molecular and cell therapies of cancer.

Gene therapy is a very attractive strategy in experimental cancer therapy. Ideally, the approach aims to deliver therapeutic genes selectively to cancer cells. However, progress in the improvement of gene therapy formulations has been hampered by difficulties in measuring transgene delivery and in quantifying transgene expression in vivo. In clinical trials, endpoints rely almost exclusively on the analysis of biopsies, which provide limited information. Non-invasive monitoring of gene delivery and expression is a very attractive approach as it can be repeated over time in the same patient to provide spatiotemporal information on gene expression on a whole body scale. Thus, imaging methods can uniquely provide researchers and clinicians the ability to directly and serially assess morphological, functional and metabolic changes consequent to molecular and cellular based therapies. This review highlights the various methods currently being developed in preclinical models.

Non-invasive genetic imaging for molecular and cell therapies of cancer

Gene therapy is a very attractive strategy in experimental cancer therapy. Ideally, the approach aims to deliver therapeutic genes selectively to cancer cells. However, progress in the improvement of gene therapy formulations has been hampered by difficulties in measuring transgene delivery and in quantifying transgene expression in vivo. In clinical trials, endpoints rely almost exclusively on the analysis of biopsies, which provide limited information. Non-invasive monitoring of gene delivery and expression is a very attractive approach as it can be repeated over time in the same patient to provide spatiotemporal information on gene expression on a whole body scale. Thus, imaging methods can uniquely provide researchers and clinicians the ability to directly and serially assess morphological, functional and metabolic changes consequent to molecular and cellular based therapies. This review highlights the various methods currently being developed in preclinical models (AU)

SPECT/CT imaging of oncolytic adenovirus propagation in tumours in vivo using the Na/I symporter as a reporter gene.

Oncolytic adenoviruses have shown some promise in cancer gene therapy. However, their efficacy in clinical trials is often limited, and additional therapeutic interventions have been proposed to increase their efficacies. In this context, molecular imaging of viral spread in tumours could provide unique information to rationalize the timing of these combinations. Here, we use the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) as a reporter gene in wild-type and replication-selective adenoviruses. By design, hNIS cDNA is positioned in the E3 region in a wild-type adenovirus type 5 (AdIP1) and in an adenovirus in which a promoter from the human telomerase gene (RNA component) drives E1 expression (AdAM6). Viruses show functional hNIS expression and replication in vitro and kinetics of spread of the different viruses in tumour xenografts are visualized in vivo using a small animal nano-SPECT/CT camera. The time required to reach maximal spread is 48 h for AdIP1 and 72 h for AdAM6 suggesting that genetic engineering of adenoviruses can affect their kinetics of spread in tumours. Considering that this methodology is potentially clinically applicable, we conclude that hNIS-mediated imaging of viral spread in tumours may be an important tool for combined anticancer therapies involving replicating adenoviruses

Viral gene therapy.

Cancer is a multigenic disorder involving mutations of both tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. A large body of preclinical data, however, has suggested that cancer growth can be arrested or reversed by treatment with gene transfer vectors that carry a single growth inhibitory or pro-apoptotic gene or a gene that can recruit immune responses against the tumor. Many of these gene transfer vectors are modified viruses. The ability for the delivery of therapeutic genes, made them desirable for engineering virus vector systems. The viral vectors recently in laboratory and clinical use are based on RNA and DNA viruses processing very different genomic structures and host ranges. Particular viruses have been selected as gene delivery vehicles because of their capacities to carry foreign genes and their ability to efficiently deliver these genes associated with efficient gene expression. These are the major reasons why viral vectors derived from retroviruses, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpesvirus and poxvirus are employed in more than 70% of clinical gene therapy trials worldwide. Because these vector systems have unique advantages and limitations, each has applications for which it is best suited. Retroviral vectors can permanently integrate into the genome of the infected cell, but require mitotic cell division for transduction. Adenoviral vectors can efficiently deliver genes to a wide variety of dividing and nondividing cell types, but immune elimination of infected cells often limits gene expression in vivo. Herpes simplex virus can deliver large amounts of exogenous DNA; however, cytotoxicity and maintenance of transgene expression remain as obstacles. AAV also infects many non-dividing and dividing cell types, but has a limited DNA capacity. This review discusses current and emerging virusbased genetic engineering strategies for the delivery of therapeutic molecules or several approaches for cancer treatment.

Viral gene therapy

Cancer is a multigenic disorder involving mutations of both tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. A large body of preclinical data, however, has suggested that cancer growth can be arrested or reversed by treatment with gene transfer vectors that carry a single growth inhibitory or pro-apoptotic gene or a gene that can recruit immune responses against the tumor. Many of these gene transfer vectors are modified viruses. The ability for the delivery of therapeutic genes, made them desirable for engineering virus vector systems. The viral vectors recently in laboratory and clinical use are based on RNA and DNA viruses processing very different genomic structures and host ranges. Particular viruses have been selected as gene delivery vehicles because of their capacities to carry foreign genes and their ability to efficiently deliver these genes associated with efficient gene expression. These are the major reasons why viral vectors derived from retroviruses, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpesvirus and poxvirus are employed in more than 70% of clinical gene therapy trials worldwide. Because these vector systems have unique advantages and limitations, each has applications for which it is best suited. Retroviral vectors can permanently integrate into the genome of the infected cell, but require mitotic cell division for transduction. Adenoviral vectors can efficiently deliver genes to a wide variety of dividing and nondividing cell types, but immune elimination of infected cells often limits gene expression in vivo. Herpes simplex virus can deliver large amounts of exogenous DNA; however, cytotoxicity and maintenance of transgene expression remain as obstacles. AAV also infects many non-dividing and dividing cell types, but has a limited DNA capacity. This review discusses current and emerging virusbased genetic engineering strategies for the delivery of therapeutic molecules or several approaches for cancer treatment (AU)

La actividad de la Caspasa-1 como gen sensibilizador a radio y quimioterapia es independiente de las vías de JNK y p38 / Caspase-1 as a radio and chemosensitizer regardless of JNK and p38 pathways

El efecto citotóxico de las drogas antitumorales es producido mediante la inducción de apoptosis. Esta observaciónimplica la posibilidad de que los factores que afecten la activación de caspasas pueden ser determinantesimportantes como sensibilizantes a los tratamientos antitumorales. Aquí, examinamos el efecto de la sobreexpresiónde caspasa-1 en la respuesta a la quimio y radioterapia. La expresión de la caspasa-1 mediada porun vector adenoviral fue capaz de matar directamente a las células y de sensibilizar las restantes a cisplatino oradiación gamma in vitro. En células HeLa transfectadas establemente con caspasa-1, la sensibilización a cisplatinofue debida a una amplificación en la vía mitocondrial de apoptosis inducida por cisplatino pero esteefecto es independiente del estado de p53, JNK o p38 en la célula

The cytotoxic effect of anticancer drugs has been shown to involve induction of apoptosis. This observationraises the possibility that factors affecting caspase activation might be important determinants as anticancerdrug sensitivity. Ectopic expression of caspase-1 has been shown to trigger apoptosis. Here, we examine theeffect of caspase-1 over-expression on the response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Caspase-1 expressionmediated by an adenoviral vector was able to kill directly cells and to sensitize the remaining cells to cisplatinor ã-radiation in vitro. In HeLa cells stably transfected with caspase-1, sensitisation to cisplatin was due to anamplification of the cisplatin-induced mitochondrial apoptotic pathway activation but this effect is independentof p53, JNK or p38 status

Use of suicide genes for cancer gene therapy: study of the different approaches.

Cancer is a disease of high incidence for which conventional treatments are not necessarily effective. There is a need for the development of new alternative strategies. Among them, suicide gene therapy has been developed. In this approach, a gene encoding for a protein toxic under particular conditions is delivered to the target cells, resulting in their death. Although this approach has been in development for a long time, new combinations with other gene therapy areas, such as selective replicative viruses, tumour targeting, or conventional treatments such as chemo- or radiotherapy, are currently being tested. This review will summarise some of these approaches.

Transient foamy virus vector production by adenovirus vectors.

The genome of the prototype foamy virus (PFV) has been introduced into an adenoviral/PFV hybrid vector and tested for stable in vitro gene transfer. Three different adenoviruses are used to encode: (i) the PFV structural genes gag and pol (Ad-GagPolDeltaPacI); (ii) the PFV structural gene env (Ad-Env); and (iii) the PFV vector genome (Ad-MD9) encoding the transgene (the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene). Following cotransduction by the three adenoviruses, the target cells become transient PFV vector-producing cells, resulting in the in situ release of recombinant PFV at a titre of up to 10(3) vector particles/ml, which can then infect surrounding cells, leading to stable integration of the expression cassette. Stable eGFP expression, observed for up to 60 days (11 passages) in cells transduced with all three adenoviral vectors, was shown by PCR to be the result of PFV integration. In contrast, cells transduced with only the adenovirus encoding the PFV vector genome showed a marked decrease in eGFP expression by passage 2 (16 days post-transduction) and did not contain integrated PFV vector. In short, this paper describes the production of a hybrid vector capable of high in vitro transduction and stable transgene expression using adenovirus and PFV vectors.

Selective effects of E1B-defective adenoviruses and adenovirus E1A mutants in deficient mouse primary embryonic fibroblasts.

E1B-defective adenoviruses have been described as exerting selective cytopathic effects on transformed cells. Previously, we showed that adenovirus dl118, lacking both E1B proteins, very efficiently kills most human malignant cell lines. In order to study whether these selective effects were due to selective replication of dl118 in cells harboring specific genetic alterations, we compared the viability of various deficient mouse primary fibroblasts. We studied mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from p16, p21, p27 and p53 knockout mice, as well as wild-type MEFs. We infected them with 100 p.f.u. of adenoviruses adl118, adwt300, and adenoviruses carrying the E1A mutant 922 (the E1a product only binds to the p300 and related proteins) and Ad646 (the E1A product binds to the pRb and related proteins). The percentage of infectivity was evaluated with an adenovirus carrying the green fluorescent protein (AdGFP). With AdGFP, clear green fluorescent signals were detected in more than 70% of the cells after 3 days of infection. After infection with several adenoviruses, we observed that E1A mutant 922 killed all the MEFs. Conversely, the E1a mutant Ad646 exerted its major effects on control wild-type MEFs. Moreover, Adl118 killed the wtMEFs and other MEFs slightly more efficiently than did wtAd, but less than Ad922. No viral replication was detected by adding the obtained supernatants to HEK293 cells. Due to the absence of significant viral replication on these cells, the results could be interpreted as direct effects of E1A and E1A mutant proteins on the different mouse cells carrying diverse genetic alterations.

Intravascular injections of a conditional replicative adenovirus (adl118) prevent metastatic disease in human breast carcinoma xenografts.

We describe a study showing that the adenovirus adl118, lacking both E1B proteins, very efficiently kills human malignant cells 'in vitro' and 'in vivo'. Since many breast cancer patients do not have metastasis at the time of diagnosis, but finally develop it, we planned to study whether intravascular injections of adl118 could prevent metastatic development. We studied the effects of this mutant adenovirus in an orthotopic model of human breast carcinoma xenografts with the breast MB435-lung 2 cell line, which is highly metastatic in the lungs. In this study, all primary tumors were excised when they reached 50-100 mm3 volume in the animals. After surgery, 10(10) p.f.u. of adl118 was intravenously injected into a random group of animals, either three times during the first week only, or once every week. At death, almost all the control animals showed numerous lung metastases of large size, which were present in only 15-40% of the treated animals, depending on the size of the primary tumor at the time of excision. Overall survival was 50-70 days in control mice, and over 120 days in mice injected with adl118. Concomitant treatment with adl118 and cisplatin did not enhance the antitumor effects of adl118. With these results, we conclude that intravenous injection of conditional replicative adenovirus, after excision of the primary tumor, induces a clear decrease in the metastatic disease, and could be a new strategy in preventing tumor metastasis of breast carcinomas.

Tumor heterogeneity: morphological, molecular and clinical implications.

Malignant tumors are characterized by their great heterogeneity and variability. There are hundreds of different types of malignant tumors that harbour many oncogenic alterations. The tumor heterogeneity has important morphological, molecular and clinical implications. Except for some hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative processes and small cell infant tumors, there are not specific molecular alterations for most human tumors. In this review we summarize the most important aspects of carcinogenesis and chemoradiosensitivity of malignant cells. In this regard, some oncogenes such as neu, ras and bcl-2 have been associated with cellular resistance to treatment with anticancer agents. The knowledge of oncogenic alterations involved in each tumor can be important to correlate the morphological features, the genetic background, the prognosis and the clinical response to treatment with anticancer agents. Based on the molecular background of the tumor there are new cancer gene therapy protocols. For example using adenovirus Ela in tumors with overexpression of neu oncogene, inhibitors of tyrosine kinase specific for the PDGF receptor in glioma, inhibitors of farnesil transferase to prevent ras activity in tumors with mutations in the ras gene.

In vivo radiosensitizing effect of the adenovirus E1A gene in murine and human malignant tumors.

The adenovirus E1A gene is a potent inducer of chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity through p53-dependent and independent mechanisms. We have studied the sensitivity of murine (MSC11A5, a sarcomatoid epidermoid carcinoma) and human (HeLa, human cervix carcinoma) E1A-expressing tumors, in vivo, after treatment with cisplatin or gamma-irradiation. In athymic mice, half-body irradiation was performed in an AECL Cobalt unit, at an SSD of 80 cm. Daily fractions of 300 cGy over 3 days, up to a total dose of 9 Gy. Cisplatin was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 9 mg per kg of body weight. After gamma-irradiation or intraperitoneal injection of cisplatin, about 30% of the E1A-expressing tumors regressed completely or were associated with a marked decrease in tumorigenicity over the following weeks. We conclude that malignant tumors, when expressing adenovirus E1A, are very sensitive to treatment with DNA-damaging agents, in vivo, regardless of the p53 status of the tumors.

Adenovirus-mediated p16 transfer to glioma cells induces G1 arrest and protects from paclitaxel and topotecan: implications for therapy.

Malignant gliomas are highly resistant to chemotherapy, in part because of the blood-brain barrier, which restricts the delivery of chemotherapy to certain areas of tumor and their cellular heterogeneity, which leads to the selection and propagation of resistant clones. However, the molecular basis of the drug resistance is poorly understood. In this study, we examined the effect of the cell cycle-inhibitory protein p16 on the chemosensitivity of human glioma cells. Treatment of the p16-null glioma cells, U-251 MG and D-54 MG, with paclitaxel and topotecan, resulted in cell death within 4 days. However, overexpression of exogenous wild-type p16 protein using an adenovirus vector resulted in G1 arrest of glioma cells and resistance to the anticancer effect of paclitaxel or topotecan. Specifically, the p16-expressing cells showed a 30-fold increase in the ID50 of topotecan and a more than 40-fold increase in the ID50 of paclitaxel. These observations indicate that overexpression of molecules that control cell-cycle progression may be partially responsible for causing the resistance of glioma cells to cytocidal drugs.